In his weekly column, Clark Hoyt, the Times’ Public Editor, revisits the Acorn hidden-camera ‘pimp’ sting that has pushed the organization to the brink of bankruptcy. Hoyt quotes an independent auditor, who confirms the most damning clips, but also,
said the news media should have been far more skeptical, demanding the raw video from which the edited versions were produced. “It’s outrageous that this could have had this effect without being questioned more,” he said.
The narrative for months has been that this story was picked up by Fox and right-wing blogs, but buried by the Liberal Media until it became so big that it couldn’t be ignored. And in truth, that seemed pretty credible in this instance. I believe Hoyt had even said as much in previous columns.
But that quote reveals the real harm to the public of having unaccountable bloggers and house organs like Fox News dredging up our news: in the pursuit of a partisan story, they don’t hold themselves to basic journalistic standards. By waiting until they had to take a reactive, hasty plunge into this story, the rest of the media accepted and perpetuated the frame offered by Fox and the far right and failed to do any further reportage.
If the Times – or any real news outlet – had broken this story, they would have gotten the unedited video. It wouldn’t have been quite so salacious, but it would have been responsibly done. When conservative activists want to take down a progressive darling, and have a partisan cable channel at their beck and call, all of a sudden it poisons the well for the rest of the conversation. I knew Fox was bad for people who watched or cared about Fox, but here’s a case where it was bad for everyone. It’s all of the Sarah Palin “death panel” fallout, with none of the immediate push back, and that’s scary.